Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines — A Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Nueva Vizcaya has denied a motion for inhibition filed by accused Florentino Daynos in a criminal case arising from the barricading of public roads linked to a mineral exploration project involving Woggle Corp.

In its order, the court ruled that the motion failed to establish any legal or factual basis to warrant the inhibition of the presiding judge.

Court records show that the case originated from incidents involving the unauthorized erection of barricades along public roads in Dupax del Norte, which authorities said obstructed the passage of vehicles and equipment.

Law enforcement personnel intervened following reports that the barricades restricted access to public thoroughfares.

Daynos, identified in the case as one of the individuals leading opposition activities against the project, was subsequently charged in connection with the incidents.

In denying the motion, the RTC reiterated that judicial inhibition is not a matter of right and must be supported by clear and convincing evidence of bias, prejudice, or personal interest. The court stressed that mere allegations or disagreement with previous court actions do not meet the legal standard for disqualification.

The RTC further cited established Supreme Court doctrine that judges are presumed to act with regularity and impartiality in the performance of their duties unless proven otherwise.

Finding no showing of personal, pecuniary, or other disqualifying interest on the part of the presiding judge, the court ordered the proceedings to continue in the interest of the speedy disposition of cases. It also cautioned against the filing of motions that could unduly delay trial.

For its part, Woggle Corp. said it respects the court’s ruling and reiterated its commitment to resolving the matter through due process and the orderly administration of justice. (PR)